【写作】2023英语组写作赛项全国冠军议论文展示及专家点评

2024/01/05 17:59:40

      2023“外研社·国才杯”“理解当代中国”全国大学生外语能力大赛(英语组)写作赛项高分作文新番加更!今天小编将为大家展示写作全国决赛议论文真题及全国冠军作品,并特邀写作教学专家中国人民大学刘力副教授对作品进行专业讲解,带你掌握议论技巧,提升写作功力。


议论文真题

Write an essay in response to the passage below. You should discuss whether you agree or disagree with the argument in the passage and explain your reasons. You should choose your own title and write between 700 and 900 words. (Suggested completion time: 90 mins)


Does it matter that science is becoming less disruptive?


While the number of scientific and technological research papers published has increased dramatically over the decades, their actual “disruptive” impact has fallen, according to a report by the journal Nature this year. A 60-year data analysis found a decreasing trend in ground-breaking discoveries in research papers and patents across all domains, including social sciences, technology, physical science, and life science.


This throws a spotlight on the slowdown of innovation. While it’s arguable that such deceleration might cripple productivity and economic growth, a wider and more insightful outlook on this shift is necessary.


Our pursuit for unprecedented theories and technologies has proven to have harsh consequences: We are losing jobs due to increasing automation, and we are trapped in ethical dilemmas posed by advancements in areas such as genetics and AI. Therefore, we must slow down to protect ourselves from the possible harms caused by rapid changes in science and technology.

冠军作品展示

2023英语组写作赛项

全国冠军

邵安琦  扬州大学


Epoch-Making Scientific Discoveries: Friend or Foe?

Unprecedented theories and technologies have been considered as the hallmark of an innovation-oriented society, witness the incentives of various forms the governments have come up with to stimulate such eye-catching findings. However, with the newly-emerged innovative designs such as ChatGPT, the rationality of these discoveries has been put under the spotlight. According to some fearmongers, the less disruptive and fruitful science would benefit the mankind as it prevents the development that is detrimental to the interests of human beings. However, from my perspective, this misguided and flawed idea is in a desperate need of a rethink as our society progresses and prospers not in spite of such epoch-making findings but because of them.


To begin with, the rapid development in science would bring a myriad of advantages to society and chief among them is the economic boom. That is to say, thanks to the constantly-updated innovations brought about by our predecessors over the course of history such as steam machines, automobiles, mobile phones, and the like, the productivity of human beings has been significantly improved. The first Industrial Revolution is a case in point. Prior to the invention of steam machines, the production of goods largely hinged on manual work. Despite a host of labor and money invested in the production process, the output was not satisfactory. Driven by the pursuit of higher cost-effectiveness, Watt came up with steam machines so that the production center began to shift from households to factories, thus greatly increasing the overall productivity. Looking at the bigger picture, the improved production capability has been capable of providing sufficient goods for subsistence and exchange, which in turn promotes the prosperity of commercial activities. Apart from it, the surge of innovation also contributes to the expansion of selling channels, ranging from the most traditional paper media to the advanced e-commerce, both of whose birth and advancement could be attributed to the so-called disruptive scientific research and findings. Without the innovation of the Internet, it would be unlikely for web-savvy users to take advantage of live stream platforms and other online channels to boost sales and build brand awareness. It is not exaggerated to say that valuable innovations have taken our economic development to the next level and opened the door to a more dynamic economic mode. 


An added bonus of a soaring number of scientific findings and patents is the improvement of people's livelihood. Not only has our physical wellbeing but also mental health profits from such discoveries. For one thing, the science has played an indispensable role in enhancing people's physical conditions. After the outbreak of Covid-19, investment has been put in the research and development of medicine and vaccines. If there had been no fruitful findings in terms of curing the disease, more people would have been afflicted by the aftermath of the infection. In fact, thanks to the ground-breaking findings about the combination of traditional Chinese medicine and western pills, the symptoms have been alleviated to a greater extent. In addition to their vital role in safeguarding people's physical health, meaningful and enlightening scientific findings also serve as a major contributor to improving people's state of mind. To be more specific, it is the researchers devoting their energy to the study of mental health that successfully put its importance under the spotlight. Before the affirmation offered by scientific findings concerning the most common mental diseases such as depression, social anxiety disorder, post-traumatic anxiety disorder, few people were cautious about mental health and hence some suffered from mental disorders without any effective curing plans. These discoveries genuinely save them from an abyss of torture and despair as science has shed light on various forms of mental problems. 


Despite the aforementioned benefits of scientific findings, particularly those without any precedence, some naysayers show a complete disregard to them, fretting that these discoveries would eventually atrophy and thwart the development of our society. In the fearful list of side-effects these opponents have proposed, the most frequently cited one is that more and more people have been thrown into unemployment because of the appearance of state-of-the-art technologies. Undoubtedly, the underpaid, undervalued, physically-exhausting, and mentally-draining jobs have gradually fallen victim to automation and the utilization of robots. However, if we resist and even hinder scientific development for the sake of protecting our own interests, this boycott might be counterproductive and even boomerang in the long run. That is because people who argue for the slowdown of science and technology are ignorant of an important point: when machines replace us in some low-skilled jobs, more productive forces would be unleashed which could be diverted to areas where human beings are still irreplaceable. Therefore, people who have lost their jobs are able to receive training so that they could operate and maintain the machines, thus earning more salaries in a safer and healthier working environment. In a word, we should not lament the loss of jobs and blame it on science and technologies as they themselves are harmless and neutral. It is our mankind who should take the initiative to go with the tides of our time and become a trailblazer rather than a blind follower. 


In a nutshell, if we are to embrace a better world with more prospects and possibilities and eschew sluggish and frail development, there is no reason for us not to foster and encourage the development of innovation in scientific realms. More importantly, we human beings should be empowered and enabled to make full use of the most advanced findings rather than being enslaved by them.


(为真实展示选手赛场写作风貌,文章是从iTEST 智能测评云平台中直接导出的原生作品,仅供学习分享使用。)


专家解读

刘力  副教授

中国人民大学


博士、副教授、硕士生导师。主要研究领域为语言测试与评估、语言教学、二语习得等。担任2020—2023“外研社·国才杯”英语组写作赛项全国决赛评委。近年获北京市高等教育教学成果奖一等奖(2017)、二等奖(2021)、北京高校教师教学创新大赛三等奖(2022)等。主持和参与国家级、省部级、校级课题10项,出版专著1部,主编和参编教材6部,发表教学研究论文十余篇。

      刘力副教授从一致性论据使用连贯性三个方面对选手作文进行了全面评析,并提出了几点待改进之处。



专家点评

Before we analyze the text, let's review the writing prompt. It revolved around discussing whether we should exercise caution in the face of the potential harms stemming from the swift advancements in science and technology. The core of the discussion lies not in questioning the necessity of scientific research but in contemplating whether it would be prudent to postpone radical scientific development. This argumentative essay presents a well-structured and coherent perspective on the positive impact of scientific discoveries on society. Let's analyze the essay in terms of unity, support, and coherence.


UNITY


The essay maintains a robust sense of unity by consistently directing attention to its central argument: the affirmative influence of scientific discoveries on society. From the outset, a clear thesis statement establishes the author's stance on the positive impact of scientific breakthroughs. Each paragraph contributes cohesively to the argument, with a logical organization that ensures a seamless progression of ideas.


Critical to this unity is the effective use of topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph. These sentences cover the main idea of the section to guide the readers and ensure that each paragraph aligns with the overall thesis.


The essay consistently focuses on the positive aspects of scientific discoveries, whether in terms of economic benefits or improvements in people's lives. This consistency avoids unnecessary deviations from the central theme, which also reinforces the unity of the essay.


SUPPORT


In substantiating the essay's argument, the author provides compelling support through specific examples and historical references. By invoking critical moments such as the first Industrial Revolution, the advent of steam machines and automobiles, the proliferation of mobile phones, and the rise of the internet, the author highlights the transformative role of scientific innovations in propelling economic growth and improving living standards.

 

Moreover, the essay engages with potential counterarguments, particularly addressing concerns related to unemployment. The response to these counterarguments not only adds depth to the overall argument but also demonstrates the author's comprehensive understanding of the dynamics involved.

 

Especially, by using the example that shows the impactful role of Chinese medicine in alleviating symptoms, the author not only emphasizes the efficacy of these medical practices but also tells a broader story of cultural resilience and innovation. This also serves as a bridge connecting scientific advancements with the richness of Chinese cultural traditions.


COHERENCE


The essay demonstrates a high level of coherence through its organization and careful attention to the logical progression of ideas. The author establishes a clear and effective structure that guides the reader through a seamless journey of understanding. In addition, the logical order in which examples are presented contributes significantly to the overall coherence of the argument. The essay follows a well-reasoned sequence by first discussing the economic benefits of scientific discoveries and subsequently addressing improvements in people's livelihoods.

 

The coherence of meaning within paragraphs is also crucial. For instance, in the second paragraph, the phrase "Looking at the bigger picture" signals a shift from specific details to a broader perspective. Additionally, the expression "Apart from it" indicates the author's intention to discuss another facet of the economic benefits resulting from innovation.


SUGGESTIONS


There are a few areas where it could be refined. 

01

While the thesis statement is clear, a slight refinement or reiteration in the conclusion could reinforce the central argument and leave a lasting impression on the reader.

02

The balance between complexity and clarity is essential. Revisiting sentence structures for some degree of simplification can enhance overall readability. For example, the structure of the thesis statement (see the blue content of the contestant's text) is somewhat unbalanced, and the reference to "them" may lack clarity. It might benefit from revision as follows:


"…it is crucial to reassess this misguided and flawed concept, considering that our society advances and flourishes not in defiance of groundbreaking discoveries, but rather, owing to their profound impact."

Overall, it is a well-written and persuasive exploration of the positive impacts of epoch-making scientific discoveries on society.







      读完高分议论文和刘力副教授的细致点评,相信大家对如何写好议论文一定有了更深刻的认知。针对科学技术的快速发展对当代社会的影响,你有何观点?划时代的科学技术在你看来是敌是友?欢迎大家来留言区交流!更有往期精彩回顾,点击下方蓝字获取。


2023写作全国亚军记叙文展示

回到顶部